Paradox management is an incredibly important aspect of being a modern leader. In a complex and complicated world, your ability to deal with many of the paradoxes faced by today's leaders can actually be paramount to your success as a leader.
Paradoxes come in many different shapes and sizes, but they have one thing in common: they often involve seemingly incompatible demands or conflicting goals that require a balancing act to find the right path forward. Therefore, it takes a man or woman to lead in this field of sometimes conflicting expectations, ambitions and goals.
Paradoxes are a natural part of any organization's complex reality, and how you as a leader deal with them can have a significant impact on your organization's ability to thrive and adapt.
In this blog post, we will therefore dive deeper into paradox management and explore why it has become so crucial in modern organizations where paradoxes are everywhere, can arise, and offer some advice on how you as a leader can best handle the many paradoxes you encounter.
What is paradox management and why is it important?
Unlike concepts such as LEAN or situational leadership, paradox management is not a traditional management method, but rather a conceptual toolbox that aims to help leaders understand and navigate complex organizational structures. In a time when organizational complexity is typically high, paradox management is crucial in promoting a holistic and flexible approach to leadership.
One of the key aspects of paradox management is recognizing paradoxes as the perfectly natural part of organizations and businesses as they are. As such, it's more the rule than the exception that companies have one or more significant paradoxes in their organization. As a leader, you should expect to face tensions, conflicts and dilemmas in your daily management practice - especially when it comes to strategy development, leadership and decision-making.
In fact, you could say that paradoxes are a bit of a paradox for businesses. Because these paradoxes that all businesses encounter have both potential benefits and rewards, as well as the potential for devastating consequences. Therefore, how they are handled is crucial.
On the positive side, paradoxes have the potential to strengthen and consolidate your leadership efforts, especially if you thoroughly analyze the key paradoxes surrounding your organization's products and the value you are trying to create. Paradoxes can actually act as a powerful focus that highlights the necessity of your company's existence in tackling important and challenging tasks. They can also act as catalysts for new thinking and innovation, and many leaders find motivation and energy in trying to balance them.
On the other hand, paradoxes can also have devastating consequences for both individual leaders and organizations if not dealt with constructively. For example, they can lead to the organization losing its strategic direction. Leaders can become trapped in a cycle of reactivity, constantly trying to juggle conflicting demands without a clear vision or strategy for the future of the organization.
At the same time, it can lead to frustration and dissatisfaction when employees feel that their leaders can't deal with paradoxes effectively. They may feel like they are being subjected to unfair or inconsistent management decisions, which can negatively impact both their engagement and wellbeing.
You can also read about: transformational leadership
Read more: Guide to better well-being in the workplace: 5 tips
Classic paradoxes in the workplace
In the workplace, managers and employees face a number of classic paradoxes on an almost daily basis that can be challenging to manage. These paradoxes arise as a result of conflicting demands, goals and expectations embedded in the structure and culture of the organization. Therefore, being able to identify and understand these paradoxes is crucial to effective leadership and organizational success.
Below we've listed some of the classic paradoxes you may encounter as a leader:
Flexibility and stability
One of the most common paradoxes in the workplace is the balance between flexibility and stability. Typically, companies often want to be super agile and need to be able to adapt to rapidly changing market conditions. But at the same time, they typically also need a degree of stability and control to maintain efficiency and reliability. This dichotomy creates a paradox where you as a leader must find the right balance between fostering innovation and agility while maintaining organizational coherence and consistency.
Centralization and decentralization
Another classic paradox is the tension between centralization and decentralization of decision-making power. Organizations often want to strengthen employee engagement and autonomy by giving them decision-making power at lower levels - perhaps even developing self-managing teams. At the same time, however, centralized decision-making structures may be needed to ensure compliance with policies and strategic goals. Such a paradox requires leaders to find the right balance between delegating power and decision-making authority while maintaining effective governance of the business.
Hierarchies and organizational structures
Another challenge that can arise is the conflict between maintaining traditional hierarchies while promoting flat organizational structures. Traditional hierarchies provide clarity in responsibilities and roles, but they can also inhibit creativity and innovation. Flat organizational structures can promote collaboration and idea sharing, but they can also create uncertainty about roles and responsibilities. Leaders are often faced with the paradox of finding the right organizational structure to fit the needs of the organization.
The examples here show how paradoxes can manifest in the workplace and create challenges for both managers and employees. Recognizing and managing these paradoxes requires skill in the art of paradox management, where leaders must be able to find creative and innovative solutions to seemingly conflicting demands.
What's the best way to deal with paradoxes as a leader?
Managing paradoxes as a leader requires a conscious approach and the ability to navigate complex and contradictory challenges. Jan Heiberg Johansen, author of the book 'Paradox Management - The Pursuit of Value in Complexity', says there are three essential rules to keep in mind when dealing with paradoxes in your daily work as a leader:
- Coming to terms with paradoxes: It is crucial to embrace the tensions that arise, rather than trying to hide them. Often referred to as "acceptance" of paradoxes, this is a fundamental prerequisite for working with them constructively. It is necessary to take the tensions seriously, as the different aspects of the paradox are essential to the value creation of the organization; otherwise the paradox would not exist as such.
- Looking at the whole organization: It is crucial to consider the organization as an integrated entity interacting with its environment when working with paradoxes and seeking to leverage them for value creation. This is because paradoxes cannot be solved in the same way as regular problems that can be identified and solved. Paradoxes will continue to exist and different stakeholders will influence how to work with them.
- Developing flexibility in tactics: It is essential to be able to use a wide range of paradox tactics in order to adapt your approach to dealing with paradoxes. This involves the ability to understand different types of tactics and adapt them according to need and situation.
The paradox tactics that Jan Heiberg Johansen mentions are his take on how leaders can take a concrete approach to solving the paradoxes they encounter. His point is that in the real world, it is challenging to separate paradoxes from the tactics we implement, as they are a complex intertwining of paradoxes and our response to them.
In other words, paradoxes are shaped by multiple factors, such as the requirement to achieve both efficiency and quality with limited resources and tight timeframes. Our choice of tactics represents the way we try to connect these factors.
Read how to lead with: strategic management
Overall, Jan Heiberg Johansen works with three different categories of tactics for dealing with paradoxes:
Avoidance is a tactic that attempts to deal with paradoxes by separating them in time or space. This will usually involve prioritizing one side of the paradox at a certain point in time and then shifting focus to the other side later. For example, a manager may decide to focus on cost reductions in one quarter and then shift to quality improvements in the next quarter. This tactic may provide a temporary solution and relief, but it doesn't solve the paradox in its entirety and can lead to challenges later on.
Activation is a tactic that involves trying to deal with paradoxes by holding and integrating both sides of the paradox at the same time. Instead of separating them, you try to find ways to combine them so that they complement each other. For example, a leader can work to increase both efficiency and quality by implementing new processes and technologies that improve both sides of the paradox. This is a tactic that often requires creative thinking and innovative solutions, but it can lead to more sustainable results.
Transcendence is about trying to transcend paradoxes by finding a higher level of solutions or perspectives that make the paradox irrelevant or less limiting. It involves being able to think beyond the traditional ways of dealing with paradoxes and looking for new approaches that can transform the paradox into an opportunity. For example, a leader may try to develop a new business model that allows them to achieve both efficiency and quality in a way that wasn't previously possible. This tactic often requires a new mindset and a willingness to challenge conventional perceptions.
In paradox management, it's important to choose the right tactics depending on the situation and the specific paradox you're facing. Sometimes it may be necessary to use a combination of tactics to achieve the best results. The key is to understand that paradoxes are a natural part of modern management and that there are different approaches to dealing with them constructively.
.png)